Mozilla Google budget screaming 

Something is just wrong here... Mozilla just extended its deal with Google (making it the numero uno search engine) for something like 400 million dollars PER YEAR. For the next three years.

That is 1.2 BILLION dollars from 2020 to 2023.

If you cannot run a freaking NON-PROFIT on 400 MILLION dollars PER YEAR that means:

a) You are paying your executives too much.
b) You don't know how to manage a non-profit.
c) All of the above.

@ParadeGrotesque "However, several sources have confirmed that the organization is sound financially, and the layoffs were part of a restructuring of its core business, with Mozilla moving away from its current role of internet standards steward and experimental approach to its product catalog to more commercially-viable offerings that generate revenues on their own."

This from the link you pasted. So sounds like it has nothing to do with budget, but rather changing priorities.


Let me ask you: why is a non-profit organization trying to sell commercial products?

This is a *non* *profit*for Pete's sake. They are moving away from what they are supposed to do!

@ParadeGrotesque that's a fair question to ask, and not one I know the answer to.

Your assertion in OP though is misleading and dangerous for Mozilla in the long run.


How is it misleading? 400M$ per year should be enough to cover Mozilla expenses.

I *know* there are some incredibly important non profit orgs running on much less per year.

For instance, Amnesty international, which is a huge org, has a budget of +/- 300M$ per year. And they do a lot more in the real world, while Mozilla work (while important) is entirely "virtual".

My point is the following: Mozilla does not have to fire anyone. This is bad management, pure and simple.

@ParadeGrotesque @karan

The commercial arm which raises unrestricted income to support the non-profit is a common model - amnesty etc will have this too. I agree completely that they do have loads of money.

It's frustrating that their commercial activity doesnt seem to be targeted at diversifying away from that Google money. Never has been from what I've seen.

@jamesmullarkey @ParadeGrotesque read the post in the link. Diversifying income is exactly why they say they have to refocus.


@karan @ParadeGrotesque

Yeah that is what they always say. In two more years we will be back here again. :)

Sign in to participate in the conversation

The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!