so, content warnings need to be implemented much smarter.

first of all, make it a list so you can easily enumerate multiple forms of content that's parse-able to computers.

second, make users have more control over what's hidden and what's not. let people pick having a whitelist or a blacklist. i'm a pretty well-off privileged person, i don't need to have half posts on my feed hidden away with a click. it's just not good ux for me since i don't have any ptsd or the like.

Follow

@nekorug

Yes, for sure

It doesn't even need to be a fixed list, just the UI for picking them, should steer people towards common existing ones

A fun additional feature would be for spoilers -- include enough details (maybe even page/timestamp) and people won't see it UNTIL they get to that point, then make it easy to find.

Also, we need three states per label: Always, Ask, and Never. I don't want to be asked repeatedly about something that's too triggery.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
w3c.social

For people involved in the activities of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), in Working Groups or Community Groups, and people who follow the work of the W3C. Run on a volunteer basis by Sandro Hawke and others, NOT the W3C systems team, and NOT supported by W3C. Uses the W3C Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct. A place to talk online about the things you would talk about in a meeting, or at a meal with your group. We plan to have a relay-bot soon, so don't feel like you need an account here to be a member of this online community. Please post things you think the W3C community might find interesting!